Search Everything

Find articles, journals, projects, researchers, and more

Back to Articles

Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception

Authors:
David K. Turok, M.D., Alexandra Gero, M.P.H., Rebecca G. Simmons, Ph.D., Jennifer E. Kaiser, M.D., Gregory J. Stoddard, M.P.H., Corinne D. Sexsmith, M.S., Lori M. Gawron, M.D., Jessica N. Sanders, Ph.D.

Abstract

This randomized noninferiority trial compared the efficacy of levonorgestrel 52mg IUDs (LNG-IUD) and copper T380A IUDs for emergency contraception in 711 participants who had unprotected intercourse within 5 days prior. The primary outcome pregnancy at 1 month occurred in 0.3% (1/317) of LNG-IUD users versus 0% (0/321) of copper IUD users, with an absolute difference of 0.3 percentage points (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.8), meeting the prespecified noninferiority margin of 2.5 percentage points. Adverse event rates were similar between groups (5.2% vs. 4.9%). The study demonstrates that LNG-IUDs are a viable alternative to copper IUDs for emergency contraception, addressing patient preferences while maintaining high efficacy.

Keywords: Emergency contraception intrauterine device (IUD) levonorgestrel IUD copper IUD randomized trial noninferiority
DOI: https://doi.ms/10.00420/ms/9423/HLROV/EAO | Volume: 384 | Issue: 4 | Views: 0
Download Full Text (Free)
Article Document
1 / 1
100%

Subscription Required

Your subscription has expired. Please renew your subscription to continue downloading articles and access all premium features.

  • Unlimited article downloads
  • Access to premium content
  • Priority support
  • No ads or interruptions

Upload

To download this article, you can either subscribe for unlimited downloads, or upload 0 items (articles and/or projects) to download this specific article.

Total: 0 / 0
  • Choose any combination (e.g., 2 articles + 1 project = 3 total)
  • After uploading, you can download this specific article
  • Or subscribe for unlimited downloads of all articles