Equitable Access to Higher Education: Trends, Commodification and quality dimensions in Namibia
Abstract
Higher education in most countries plays a pivotal role in the socio-economic development of
citizens, hence the perception that no country can be better than the quality of its higher
education system (Okwakol, 2012). It is at higher education that most governments have
channelled considerable human and financial resources with a strategic view to develop
human capital in the form of entrepreneurs, professionals, academics, political, religious and
business leaders, who are further expected to contribute to the attainment of national goals
and aspirations as embodied in Namibia’s Vision 2030 (National Planning Commission
Secretariat, 2004). The National Council for Higher Education (NCHE) in Namibia was thus
mandated by Parliament, Act 26 of 2003, to promote access and monitor quality assurance in
higher education (NCHE, 2009). In view of emergent forces of Commodification in
education, the study examined the challenges on access to higher education, the rise in tuition
fees and the impact this may have on quality provision and to the economy at large.
Following an interpretive paradigm, the study used semi structured questionnaires through
snowballing on 25 school leavers and purposive sampling which accounted for 20 grade 12
students, 10 university lecturers, 50 university students and conducted interviews on 3
university administrators on key issues inhibiting access and impacting the quality of
education in Namibia’s higher education. Using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) the study
formed themes for discussion so as to describe and capture the challenges inherent. The study
concluded that while Namibia has made tremendous strides in funding education in general,
the funding of higher education has gradually declined over the years thus negatively
impacting access to higher Education especially for students from poor backgrounds. It was
also noted that the rise in higher education enrolments may be a masking of social
inequalities on access well as a threat to quality provision.