Balancing Act — Probability, Precision, and the Future of Critical Care Trials in ARDS
Abstract
This NEJM editorial by Moskowitz and Gong reviews the implications of the REMAP-CAP trial simvastatin arm for critically ill Covid-19 patients meeting ARDS criteria. Although simvastatin showed a 95.9% posterior probability of superiority for improving organ support–free days, it failed to meet the prespecified Bayesian threshold of 99%, prompting early trial stoppage due to low enrollment. The article critiques high stopping thresholds, adaptive randomization (as high as 9:1 ratio favoring intervention), and limited phenotypic enrichment in the trial cohort (mostly hypoinflammatory subtype). Authors advocate for more refined subphenotyping in ARDS, integration of biomarker-guided precision medicine, and flexible trial designs that avoid premature exclusion of subgroups. They highlight challenges in balancing efficiency vs. certainty in adaptive trials and call for deeper mechanistic understanding of inflammatory profiles in ARDS and Covid-19 to guide intervention eligibility.