Search Everything

Find articles, journals, projects, researchers, and more

Review

INNOVATIVE RESEARCH: WRITING AN EFFECTIVE ABSTRACT TO IMPROVE YOUR ARTICLE QUALITY AND READABILITY

Atianashie Miracle A, Chukwuma Chinaza Adaobi
Jan 06, 2026
30 views
0 downloads
4.0 (1 ratings)
PEER-APPROVED

Peer-reviewed, checked for proper language and field's best practices.

4.00 /5
Innovative approach Strong evidence Cross-disciplinary relevance

Integrity checks

Plagiarism screening, powered by iThenticate
Language quality
Field-specific best practices

Abstract

There are plenty of good reasons why you should invest time and energy in writing your abstract. It will form the basis for several key decisions: whether an editor sends out your submission for review, whether the reviewer accepts that review invitation, and whether other researchers read your published paper. Unless your article is open access, the title and abstract are the only elements freely available to everyone. Don’t forget, the more your article is read, the greater the chance it will be cited in further research papers! So, getting your abstract right is important. In this review paper, we answer common questions from early career researchers, including, "What is the ideal length for an abstract?" How much detail should I include? And what kind of language works best? You will come away with an understanding of the role the abstract can play in your paper’s success and the actions you can take to ensure it is the very best it can be.
See All
D
Dr. Linda A. Mensah

Some sections are repetitive and could be streamlined, particularly where similar advice is reiterated across multiple subsections. Tightening the prose and reducing redundancy would improve readability and align the paper more closely with best practices it advocates. Minor grammatical and punctuation issues should also be corrected in a final language edit.

1 0
C
Clinton Amponsah

ASASASAS

0 0
C
Clinton Amponsah

ASSSAS

0 0
D
Dr. Emmanuel K. Asare

The frequent reliance on informal sources (e.g., ResearchGate quotations) weakens the scholarly tone. Replacing or supplementing these with peer-reviewed journal articles or recognised academic writing guides would improve credibility. Additionally, in-text citation style should be standardised consistently throughout the manuscript.

1 0

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Login